Ben Felix
- Can’t compare rent to mortgage payments
- Can compare unrecoverable costs: a cost you pay w/ no associated residual value
- Rent: the rent
- Buy: not mortgage payment, property taxes, maintenance cost, and cost of capital
- Property taxes ~ 1%; generally higher in states w/o income taxes (like 2%)
- Maintenance costs ~ 1% of the home’s value
- Cost of capital
- Cost of debt: interest costs ~ 3% (add with pt, mc = 5% rule)
- Cost of equity capital: you put down 20% on real estate instead of an alternative asset.
- Globally real estate returned 1.3% from 1900 – 2017; stocks returned 5.2% after 1.7% inflation. So a nominal return of 3% for real estate; 6.9% for stocks. Round it to 3% cost of equity capital in real estate.
- 5% rule: take value of the home you are considering, multiply by 5%, and divide by 12. If you can rent for less than that, renting is sensible.
- $500,000K home would have $25,000 in unrecoverable costs or $2,083 per month
- Can go the other way. Rental of $3k, multiply by 12, and divide by 5 is $720k. SO renting for 3K is financially equivalent to buying a $720k home.
- 5% rule becomes 4% if you are holding a less aggressive stock portfolio, if you are taxed harshly on those investments, etc.
- Housing best investment ever?
- Real estate return = net rental income + price increase in the home
- If you live in the house, you don’t get the rental income
- So really, if you are living in the house, you already aren’t the subject of most claims about real estate’s great returns
- 1870-2015 for GLOBAL housing 7.05% compared to 6.89% for stocks
- but that means that you had to invest in housing in ALL countries
- plus, housing, unlike stock, is not homogenous
- and if you could buy housing across the world, you still have to manage all the properties
- investing in any one asset is not a compensated risk. uncompensated risks can usually be diversified away by investing in a whole asset class, but that is hard with real estate.
- If your monthly housing cost is higher than what you could rent it for, that loss will decline over time assuming your mortgage is fixed and there exists some level of rent inflation
- Missing a single month of rent per year crushes returns
- You basically have to be perfect to match the stock market
- And if you buy in a single locality, you are in a similar situation to buying a single stock: the idiosyncrasies of the locality profoundly affect you
- Why rent instead of buy?
- Less risk: Short-term (<10 yrs) price fluctuations can crush a buyer who has to move. Not to mention the risk of taking on debt.
- Predictable cost: maintenance costs for homes that can be random
- No investment illusion: homeowners will spend heavily on a variety of things under the guise of increasing the price of the home even though there is no such guarantee that such efforts will pay off
- Buildings can never go up in value. Ever. Period. Only land can go up in value.
- Homeowners also pay “rent”
- Renting services from the city in the form of property taxes
- Unrecoverable maintenance costs just to keep their house inhabitable
- Renting money from the bank while they have a mortgage
- What about once the mortgage is paid off?
- $500k home. Could sell and keep $475. Could invest that money at 6% while the long-term expected return on real estate is only 3%. That difference is op cost or $14k per year. Plus you still have maintenance and taxes post-mortgage.
- People think their homes are better investments than they actually were. Big numbers. Failing to understand compound returns and the costs along the way. Not to mention inflation.